You know who we are (even though you haven’t seen much of us on this website for quite a while). You know how we vote. And you know how we feel about Cheeto Mussolini. The TL;DR is: vote for Democrats.
You may not believe us, but we are really getting tired of saying that. The editorial staff at the Clam ranges ideologically from “Kim Driscoll’s Get Stuff Done Wing of the Democratic Party” to “Fully Automated Luxury Gay Space Communism,” so while none of us are particularly conservative, we do manage to have some healthy debates over how exactly we think society should be run and who is best to do that. But at the end of the day, most of us will go for the option that isn’t frequently in bed with Nazis. So…
Our pick for President: Kamala Harris
Period.
Look, we would have voted for Joe over Donald Trump. We would have voted for a houseplant over Trump, even if it was that one from Little Shop of Horrors. Biden has clearly lost his fastball and the toughest job in the world has taken a lot out of him. Just driving through Tally’s Corner from Angle Street takes a lot out of us, so we get it. A diminished Biden was still a better choice than a shambling mound of fast food, grievance, and rage that already bungled the levers of power once and who wants to literally jail his enemies (of which he has quite a few). Trump has shown us clearly that he’s incapable of leading a one-man parade, let alone the United States. This past weekend’s Trump rally – where the campaign paraded a line of supporters who went on racist tirades against Puerto Rico, Hispanic-Americans, and African-Americans, lobbed anti-Asian and misogynistic insults against Kamala Harris, and culminated with Trump’s usual inflammatory and fascist rhetoric about the “crooked, radical left machine” and “the enemy from within” – is just the latest example. Someday in the future, history will look back at this era, see the people who supported Trump – whether fervently or passively – and judge them harshly. And Hulk Hogan is dead to us now.
We were ok with hoping for another four years under Biden like the last four, ready to vote for Kamala Harris to be the successor. Biden stepping aside just moved it up a bit. Do we like Kamala Harris? Absolutely. Does she have the intellect and temperament to be President? Absolutely. Is she more likely to preserve America’s standing in the world? Absolutely. In a Harris presidency, Ukraine will be supported, NATO will be a powerful tool to neutralize Russian expansion, Taiwan will be protected from an invasion from the mainland, and we’ll continue to be the only major global economy that didn’t have a full-on recession from COVID and the aftermath. And yes – despite what your cousin yelled at you at the Labor Day barbeque – she DOES actually have her own agenda of plans to make life for Americans better. It’s all on her website and social media. Tell your cousin to loosen that MAGA hat, and go read all about it instead of embarrassing himself in front of his kids.
Joe, thanks for the memories. Kamala, let’s make some new ones. Donald, we told you to stop calling us.
We are really going to miss the “Dark Brandon” memes, though.
Our pick for US Senate: Elizabeth Warren
You don’t need us to tell you about Elizabeth Warren. Or maybe you do, if you are one of those types that thinks she is a raging socialist because she has the audacity to say that a society where all the wealth sits with a handful of people (note: this is not you and never will be) isn’t the best way to run things. She may go a bit hard for some people, but honestly, we probably need that. If you are the type who seriously doubts her bona fides, indulge yourself on one of her 13 books (the majority of which were written before she was a senator, so just cool your jets before you go off) or her sizable library of academic publications. In terms of policy, she has been on the right side of almost everything we care about: health care, child care, making sure the wealthy pay their fair share of taxes, et cetera et cetera. We would probably pick Warren over a lot of people on those alone.
We’ll admit, John Deaton is doing his damndest to make himself seem electable, if for no other reason than to avoid Warren crushing him more handily than she did Geoff Diehl in 2018. Deaton has said that he’d break with his party and vote to make a woman’s right to choose the law of the land, as well as a couple of other things that are unusual to hear from a Republican who is running at the federal level. This is Massachusetts, after all. But merely not being a crazy person isn’t a particularly compelling reason to elect someone to be a US Senator. In any case, we’ve seen what happens to seemingly reasonable Republicans when they get to Washington and have to get along with the rest of their party, which has vacated any facade of a desire to govern responsibly. We don’t know if you remember Scott Brown, but we do.
How could we forget?
Scotty 2 Hotty won a special election to take Ted Kennedy’s seat in the Senate in 2010. His appearance on the scene killed any prospect that the Affordable Care Act (AKA Obamacare) would be anything more than the landmark-though-slightly-underwhelming legislation that it ended up being. It was also quite a lift to get Brown to listen to his constituents and break ranks to vote for some sensible banking regulations after the worst Wall Street-induced financial crisis since the Great Depression. (Sensible regulations, we will note, which included the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, the brainchild of a pre-Senate Elizabeth Warren.) We aren’t willing to take that gamble now that the Republican Party has flipped from “corporations are people” to “dictator on day one.” It isn’t just about good policy anymore. It isn’t even about passable policy. The woman, trans folks, people of color, and others that regularly come under attack from both elected Republicans and their base can’t take that risk. Fascism is pretty bad for the economy as well. It’s Warren all the way.
Also, a crypto bro with an endorsement from Elon Musk? Really? Nope.
Our pick for State Representative: Ann-Margaret Ferrante
Ferrante has been the state rep for Gloucester, Rockport, and Essex since 2009, with Manchester getting thrown in during redistricting to give her the full Cape Ann set since 2022. As the daughter of a fisherman who has lived in downtown Gloucester her whole life, Ferrante knows the community and the people in it. She’s also got a pretty hefty educational background: a double-major bachelor’s degree including economics, a law degree, and a master’s in public administration. She has proven to be effective and actually pretty visionary, having helped to spearhead the creation of the Gloucester Marine Genomics Institute and Gloucester Biotechnology Academy, bringing science to Gloucester’s waterfront and giving students a new path to actual careers in the life sciences without needing a college degree. GMGI even named a fellowship after her in recognition of her pretty relentless support.
More than all that, Ferrante has played the State House game well. Politics is fundamentally about working with people, after all. She worked her way up, serving as chair of a number of committees and a stint in House leadership. Now she’s earned a spot as Vice Chair of the House Ways and Means Committee. For those of you who had friends in high school and aren’t government nerds, the Ways and Means Committee is the last stop for every budget and piece of legislation that goes through the Massachusetts House of Representatives before it gets a vote on the floor. That means that every bill, every dollar appropriated, and every amendment filed comes across Ferrante’s desk and gives her the opportunity to press her finger on the scale in favor of her constituents (that’s us). With something like 5000 bills filed every legislative session, that’s a lot of paper.
Ann-Margaret Ferrante’s desk, probably.
It’s also a pretty big deal, if we say so ourselves. Combine that with the fact that Bruce Tarr is the minority leader in the Senate and Cape Ann gets two very big influencers at a scale that rank and file reps and senators can’t match. Year after year, they have worked together to bring the funding to Cape Ann necessary to do things like grow GMGI, vastly expand The Open Door to meet growing food insecurity, support the formalization of the Grace Center to help the unhoused, reopen the UMass Marine Station for fisheries and environmental research, and a lot more. Heck, we are such fans of the tag team that we might even tell you to make sure you vote for Bruce too, even if he is a Republican and doesn’t have an opponent this year. As Jim Dowd told his kids at every election cycle, Bruce Tarr is “The one Republican daddy votes for.” We miss that guy.
We aren’t going to waste much time talking to you about Ferrante’s opponent, if for no other reason than the fact that he hasn’t given us much to talk about. Former Ward 3 City Councilor and City Council President Steve LeBlanc pulled papers to run as an independent. He has said in the one interview he has done as of this writing that he likes to help people and do things and that the parties don’t do enough bipartisan work. It would be a wonderful message if not for the paragraph immediately previous to this one where we talked about LITERALLY ALL THE BIPARTISANSHIP between Bruce Tarr and Ann-Margaret Ferrante. It also lacks any actual reasoning to throw out Ferrante in favor of him, which would be a pretty uphill argument anyway, given the results she produces and her position in the House. We heard that he wouldn’t even accept an invitation from the local League of Women Voters to have a debate. If you can’t manage to debate one person, how can voters be even remotely confident that you can joust with the 159 other reps who are gunning for the same resources for their districts that you are for yours? We’ve been positive on LeBlanc in the past during his tenure on the City Council, but there isn’t even a case to make here.
Our pick for Register of Deeds: Eileen Duff
Eileen Duff is a North Shore powerhouse who has served on the Governor’s Council for 12 years. Southern Essex County needs a competent leader to fill the shoes of retired Register of Deeds John L. O’Brien, Jr., who occupied that office for an impressive 48 years and worked to make the massive number of historical records in this institution accessible to all. Duff has taken up that call. A lot of people level criticisms at politicians running for offices for which they don’t seem to have any relevant experience, but nothing could be further from the truth in this case. Duff not only brings her experience with the judiciary from her time on the Governor’s Council, but also a ton of real life interactions with the registry from her time as a real estate agent. Especially in forward-facing roles like the registry, having a broad range of experience from the customer’s perspective is extremely valuable. We have no doubt Duff will use this experience to continue serving as O’Brien did while bringing her own fresh ideas and flair to the office. Come on Eileen! (Sorry, kinda.)
Now, we’re not one to get on too much of a high horse when it comes to how one dresses, but we’ve always firmly held to the idea that you should dress for the job you want. That is why half of us here at the Clam dress like elves and the other half dress like space elves. With this in mind, we aren’t quite sure what Duff’s opponent, perennial Republican candidate Jonathan Ring, thinks he is running for.
He seems to take this seriously.
The answer could be, “Basically anything.” By our count, Ring has run for Rockport School Committee, Rockport Town Clerk, Register of Deeds (the current run marks his second), and Rockport Housing Authority, the latter of which being the only office he succeeded in holding. Even that was a bit much for us, with what we know about his views on gay, trans, and women’s reproductive rights, for a start. Given the results of all those other elections, we are willing to bet that a lot of people agree with us on that. Now, what harm could those views bring with Ring in the registrar’s office? Who knows, but we aren’t willing to give him that chance. We would much rather see Duff bring her experience to bear in that office to continue moving it forward.
Our pick for Governor’s Council: Eunice Zeigler
Eileen Duff’s departure from the Governor’s Council leaves a larger-than-Eileen-Duff sized hole in the Council. Duff’s pick to be her successor is Methuen City Councilor Eunice Zeigler. For those of you who aren’t familiar with the Governor’s Council, it is the body of eight elected councilors in Massachusetts that confirms judicial appointments and reviews pardons and commutations. We agree with Duff that Zeigler, a first generation Haitian-American with a master’s degree in economic and social development, seems right for the role. Her background and work in the community – giving individuals and families the help they need to be self-sufficient – has put her in contact with exactly the types of people who need the justice system to understand them the most. She has proven herself on the Methuen City Council and she’s ready to dive into this important yet not-well-known position. While we aren’t crazy about losing our friendly neighborhood Governor’s Councilor seat to the opposite end of the district, we will trust that Zeigler is a fan of the beach and that we will be seeing her often.
Zeigler’s Republican opponent, Peabody City Councilor Anne Manning-Martin, describes herself as “a strong independent voice.” Her pretty stock, right-wing opinions on the justice system indicate otherwise. Now, we think there are roles for all sides of the justice system to play in deliberations about how to get the best justice possible. We endorsed former cops Kevin Coppinger and Paul Tucker in their races for Essex County Sheriff and District Attorney, respectively, against opponents that were arguably more liberal, and we did it exactly for their experience in the field. We also sometimes think that one side of things already has pretty good representation in the system. A current corrections official running on her determination to make sure Massachusetts judges collaborate with ICE ain’t it for us. Anyway, given how Republicans at the federal level are handling the courts, we aren’t hot to give the same thing a chance to happen to Massachusetts.
Our pick for Essex County Clerk of Courts: Tom Driscoll
The various clerks and registers around Massachusetts may be the only elected offices that have even lower profiles than the Governor’s Council, other than Electors Under the Will of Oliver Smith (this is a real thing in nine municipalities in western Mass). We’re not even sure that we would remember that Register of Deeds existed if Jon Ring wasn’t running for it all the time. The Clerk of Courts is responsible for keeping the court’s records, running court sessions, and acting as a liaison between judges and lawyers. In Essex Country, our clerk of courts is Tom Driscoll, and we think it should stay that way. He’s been doing this job effectively since 2001. We don’t think a long incumbency should be anything but a benefit in a job that is almost solely administrative. We say Driscoll is a steady hand at the wheel, and we need that more than ever these days.
Driscoll has two opponents for the first time… ever? They are two unenrolled (AKA “independent”) candidates named Todd Angilly and Doris Rodriguez. The fact that the Republicans don’t even seem to want to contest the seat should say a decent amount on its own. We are sure they are fine people (Angilly’s the guy who replaced Rene Rancourt as the Bruins’ anthem singer), but we just don’t see the logic here.
And: Ballot questions.
Question 1: The Clam is a bit divided on this issue, though a majority of us will be voting yes. We all agree government transparency is of the utmost importance in order to uphold our democracy. What isn’t clear is if this will be successful in moving that goal forward. Currently, the Legislature is periodically audited by an outside accounting firm. If question 1 passes, the measure states that the Auditor would have the authority to audit the state legislature, something that was a significant campaign issue for current Auditor Diana DiZoglio. However, it isn’t likely to go without some pushback from the House and Senate, who say it would violate the constitutional separation of powers. We are waiting to see how this unfolds either way.
Question 2: MCAS or Nah?
The Clam is a resounding Yes on this one.
MCAS = teaching to the test, highlighting economic disparities among students. MA teachers and students are already stressed out enough these days without worrying about this huge test. At the same time, voting Yes doesn’t eliminate the MCAS, and that’s probably good. Standardized testing is a useful way to see where disparities lie between demographic groups and different districts. But tying graduation to a single test (or series of tests, in the case of MCAS) has never been a good idea. Let teachers teach.
Question 3: Yes. Unionize ride-share drivers, like Uber and Lyft drivers, who always seem to get the booty end of the stick thanks to their VC-backed employers. Slam dunk.
Question 4: Yes. As we learn more about mental health care and how much we all differ as humans, why not regulate the use of psilocybin (the active ingredient in magic mushrooms) and other hallucinogens derived from plants as another option for treatment-resistant depression and PTSD? Responsible providers will prescribe it and monitor its effects. A commission would be formed to regulate the sale and services of psychedelics. A tax would be imposed on any psychedelic treatment facilities and sales. It would also allow anyone age 21 or older to grow, possess, and use the substances in Massachusetts. (Sauce: https://www.wcvb.com/article/question-4-legalize-psychedelics-massachusetts/62600006) This seems like the most trivial of causes and, like the recreational cannabis ballot initiative a few years ago, it’s scary to opponents. Fact is, like pot, magic mushrooms are already out there. Until the Feds set up a way to do this nationally, we might as well lead the way on regulating use and distribution.
Question 5: Your The Clam are about an 80-20 split internally on this question about raising the minimum wage for tipped workers. We know and love so many people in the restaurant industry who are a No on this question, and that is about where we’re at, too. In theory, we’d like to protect those waitstaff who are in vulnerable positions at quieter, less expensive restaurants. The ones who know if they tell their boss to abide by the “minimum wage if tips dont add up” they’ll get taken off the schedule in retribution. However, this bill’s pooling of tips didn’t make sense and implementation was overly onerous. As consumers, we’d like to make sure our waitstaff aren’t hampered financially by people who chew and screw, or just leave no tip and rely on the rest of us to make it up. In reality, a more prevalent autograt on a tab for ALL would help even the playing field if this doesn’t pass.
Question 6: Yes.
Question 6 is a non-binding ballot referendum question which is only on ballots in 11 districts around the state. It is asking our opinion on whether we would like single-payer health insurance for everyone in Massachusetts. It will give our lawmakers a good idea of where we stand. More info here: https://masscare.org/ballot-question-2024/
